- Home
- ORDER TEST
- PRIVATE TEST
- ENROLL NOW
- DNA Paternity Testing
- REGULATED EMPLOYERS
- Unregulated Employers
- CLEARINGHOUSE
- AM I REGULATED ?
- CBD Concerns
- Commercial Info
- COLLECT & TESTING PROCESS
- Contact Us
- DILUTE Sample Explained
- EMPLOYER Action Plan
- Employer Legal Concerns
- ENROLLMENT APPLICATION
- ETG Urine Alcohol Testing
- Fitness For Duty
- FORMS (Client's Only)
- GETTING HELP - Resources
- HIPAA Concerns
- Laws
- MARIJUANA LEGALIZATION
- OLD MEDIA
- PAY ONLINE
- POST Accident Guide
- State Law Protections
- Terms of Use/Disclaimer
- TESTING & CUT-OFFS
- TRAINING
- VeriForce CSP (SoCal Gas)
- INSTANT Drug Screening
- FormFox LOGIN
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
Warnings on allowing some employees to stay instead of termination for others follow Drug Policy Violation.
Employer must act quick, concise and consistant for Positive/Refusals.
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
Quick, Concise and Consistant Action is required to protect Employers following a Positive/Refusal to Test.
Employer Warning about Negligent Hiring & Retention Practices
Employer's Liability for Failure to Act following Non-Negative results.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on Reasonable Accomodation vs Firing
How Employers can be held liable for NOT taking proper actions following a Positive or Refusal to Drug Test.
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on Reasonable Accomodation vs Firing
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) guidance on Reasonable Accomodation vs Firing
This employee's legal opiode addiction case offers valuable insight into the employers right to fire vs extending the employee a reasonable accomodation....read more about it!
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
Pennsylvania Medical Marijuana Act (PMMA) taken to Federal Court!
This federal court case did not protect a medical marijuana user following a Positive Drug Test
F.E.H.A. Rules for Employer on race discrimination, disability, and Employer retaliation claims foll
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
American's with Disabilities Act (ADA) did NOT protect medical marijuana user after testing positive
The California Fair Employment & Housing dismisses current employee's race, disability, and Employer retaliation claims following firing due to Rx and Marijuna Drug Test.